There is often an argument that after European games, teams
tend to struggle to get the three points in their next game. Some argue that it’s
due to the lack of preparation time, or the lack of quality in depth or even
the lack of fitness. I myself have always thought that it was something along those
lines too.
Now, of course, there needs to be a degree of rationality
and a consideration of the wider perspective.
Think about it, often teams can play poorly, yet still walk away with a win. So there is an argument that when people say a team isn’t as efficient or effective after a European game, they could mean in terms of performances, not the result.
Think about it, often teams can play poorly, yet still walk away with a win. So there is an argument that when people say a team isn’t as efficient or effective after a European game, they could mean in terms of performances, not the result.
However, I wanted to see how each side that represented the
Premier League in Europe this season faired in comparison to each other.
However, before I point out my observations, we have to
consider a few things. Firstly, we have to recognise some teams played more
games after a European game, due to their progress in Europe. In order to
combat this, I have added the points per game stat.
Table: Premier League sides representing in Europe: Their record after European Games
Key Observations
·
Business
as usual for Manchester United: After European games, Man United have been machine efficient. United won 7 of their 8 post European games which clearly
demonstrates this. Perhaps Sir Alex Ferguson’s effective rotation and strength
in depth played a key role in Man United’s consistency.
·
Arsenal
unbeaten after European games: Both Arsenal and Man United are unbeaten
after their European games. But considering this from Arsenal’s perspective, it
shows how difficult they are to beat. Their experience and knowhow through many
years of having to manage the Champions League and the Premier League is one of
the reasons why they remained unbeaten.
·
Man City
distinctly average after European games: Man City’s record is pretty
average, to be fair. Although they only lost once and conceded the least out of
the teams analysed (5), I think they should have done better. But Man
City will argue, they had tough games after their Champions League duties,
after all, they faced Liverpool away, then Arsenal at home and then Man United
at home. But given the squad at Manicni’s disposal, you’d expect them
to win one of those games.
·
Liverpool
consistently inconsistent: Liverpool’s record after European games isn’t
great. The key issue is the high number of draws, which is one of the
differences from them being a top 6 side. However, what is interesting is that Liverpool
kept 4 clean sheets, which is the highest (alongside Chelsea). In some
respects, this shows progress is being made at Anfield, but clearly, more work
needs to be done to sustain and build on it.
·
Newcastle
shipping goals: Newcastle conceded 20 goals, which is an incredibly high
number for a side playing in Europe and for me it symbolises their immense decline
this season. Last season, Newcastle were far more solid and settled side
defensively. Perhaps the club have missed Steven Taylor and Fabricio Coloccini
who have missed parts of the season for one reason or another.
·
Newcastle
actually doing rather well…: Although Newcastle are conceding a hell of a
lot of goals, they are actually winning fair number of games too. It’s intriguing;
there was strong criticism that the lack of depth effected Newcastle’s campaign
this season. Although this may well be a valid point, one may need to take it
with a pinch of salt. As Newcastle won 5 games from 13, this shows the club has
the ability to win games even when playing on a Thursday and then on a Sunday.
But it is crucial to note, all 5 of Newcastle’s wins came at home.